Comment by Prof Christos Stremmenos on the breach between Andrea
Rossi and Defkalion.
Sent to Daniele Passerini on August 8, 2011 in
Italian (original version).
----
The writer has sought in his life to pursue and humbly serve the
following VALUES in hierarchical order:
- Scientific truth and its anthropocentric contribution...
- The values of culture, democracy, human civilization and the
environmental health in which these develops.
- My home country, Greece, non in parochial terms, but
diachronically as a figure, bearing the above values.
For what concerns the first point, I confirm out of intellectual honesty
that based on my past experience, and on the work of many other
colleagues who have studied cold fusion or “nuclear reactions in the
solid-state” after 1989, aiming primarily to demonstrate the existence of
the phenomenon and its reproducibility, it was poor in all of us. From the
moment I converted, leaving the electrolytic load and opting for a more
clean system, i.e. a load of hydrogen gas on nickel (research done also in
parallel with S. Focardi and others), we were convinced that the
phenomenon of nuclear fusion in the solid-state was a scientific fact but
nothing more. The production of excess energy remained very low,
although the reproducibility of the phenomenon was gradually
improved... The hitherto unique method that overcomes the above-
mentioned problems and that makes nuclear reactions in the solid-state,
exploitable industrially is that of Mr. ANDREA ROSSI in close
collaboration with Prof. SERGIO FOCARDI. A landmark event both for
the prospect of gradual satisfaction of the energy needs in the world and
for the potential barrier that keeps us from the point of no return on
climate change on the planet...
I witnessed and participated in part to the numerous tests and
measurements, all performed with success in Bologna, Italy, the one
described in my informal report to the Greek government (7 July 2011)
not being the last.
In the presence of Mr. Rossi, Prof. Focardi, Dr. Bianchini, the writer, we
found, as besides in all the other tests, the absence of radioactivity (a
slight increase within the allowed limits, measured by Dr. Bianchini) and
the production of thermal energy of 10.6 kWh/h, largely self-sustained.
The numerical calculation made by Mr. Rossi, coincides perfectly and is
in perfect agreement with my analytical calculation (through a special
computer program) that rigorously evaluates the fundamental function of
enthalpy with general validity.
Because my interest is and remains mainly scientific, and due to my
contribution to politically and commercially encourage the transfer of
Rossi’s technology in Greece – my home country as I said earlier – I
obviously regret this breach of purely financial origin...
With the firm belief that who has given (us) this epochal technology
deserves absolute respect and consideration, I am comforted by my trait
to always with optimism see the forest and not the individual tree...
Cordial greetings
Ch Stremmenos
translated by Mats Lewan - Ny Teknik
@Daniele 22passi
RispondiEliminaCavoli, in sto periodo faccio fatica a seguirti... nonostante mi fossi detto di prendermi un po' di spazio pure io per me, mi arricchisci ogni momento di questa tranquilla estate...
Ti allungo il video su Youtube, dell'intervista a Focardi, se non lo avessi già, passato a Viareggio, ma con L'Audio Decisamente apprezzabile (stereo) e con le cuffie sembra di averlo a fianco, che oramai ritengo un Mito!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJX7GVem3VY
Anche tu sei tra le cerchie dei miei preferiti... ma non montarti la testa eh...?? ;)
@Daniele 22passi
RispondiEliminaAvevo chiesto a Rossi questo:
Enrico Maria Podestà
August 10th, 2011 at 9:45 AM
Dear Ing. Rossi is no longer downloadable from its website this document, you please give me the link right?
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf
e Rossi guarda che risposta mi da...
Andrea Rossi
August 10th, 2011 at 5:24 PM
Dear Enrico Maria Podestà:
You should be able to find it easy just going to
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
Probably you tried in one of the many moments during which our Journal is under attack from somewhere. Just try again after some hour, when it happens…our very good informatic fights close to every day for this issue. Also to me happens that I go to the site of the Journal to answer to the Readers, and the journal, literally, disappears! Then I call the informatic and he says: “Again???” Then he fights and after some hour we can work again. C’est la vie!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
verso i 20 minuti il video si interrompe e rimane solo l'audio almeno a me succede cosi .
RispondiEliminaQuesto commento è stato eliminato dall'autore.
RispondiElimina@Enrico
RispondiEliminaChe dici, e se cogliessimo il gentile suggerimento di Camillo e ci battezzassimo sul serio la CERCHIA DEL GATTO? :))
Come si può tradurre in inglese? CAT RING? CAT CREW? CAT CIRCLE? Forse l'ultima è la migliore, che dici? :)
Quanto a Rossi... certo che ha volte mi fa pensare al Capitano Nemo del Nautilus. Prima o poi lo fanno un film sulla storia di Rossi e dell'eCat... :))
@bertoldo
Strano...
@Miglietto
Mats conosce molto bene l'inglese, e vedo che persino il semplice google translate traduce breach sostantivo come violazione, infrazione, rottura, breccia e, come verbo, rompere, aprire una breccia in.
Tra l'altro, parafrasando i Pink Floyd, mi viene da cantare: another breach in the wall! :)))
@Miglietto
RispondiEliminaDa www.wordsmyth.net:
breach
*definition 1: the act, condition, or result of breaking.
*definition 2: a violation, as of a law or promise.
*definition 3: a broken area or gap, esp. in a solid structure.
*definition 4: a cessation of friendly relations.
Ho partecipato a progetti finanziati dall'UE, soggetti a contratti con molte clausole: il mancato rispetto (es. dei termini per la rendicontazione) costituisce "breach" del contratto e, quindi, l'interruzione del rapporto con l'UE e del relativo finanziamento.
Il termine, pertanto, è usato in modo corretto a proposito di Rossi e Defkalion.
Saluti
Gibed
@Daniele
RispondiEliminaSe vuoi la "cerchia del gatto", potresti pensare a modificare anche il sottotitolo del blog: anziché "il blog per quei quattro matti" ti suggerisco "il blog per quei quattro gatti" :)
Saluti
Gibed
Un lettore di PESN ha dato qui la traduzione in inglese dell'intervista di Xanthoulis.
RispondiEliminaRiporto il testo qui sotto.
"The process of establishing a power plant in Xanthi that uses hydrogen-nickel fusion continues, as the problems that seemed to exist between the inventor and the company undertaking the building of this plant have been overcome, and everything will now continue as originally planned.
Clouds have been seen in recent days in relations between the inventor of the device producing energy from hydrogen-nickel fusion, Andrea Rossi, and Defkalion Green Technologies, the company which is planning to install the relevant equipment for the power plant in Xanthi. Andrea Rossi, in his recent statement, talked about suspending cooperation with the Greek company Defkalion, and of turning to a big company in the U.S. instead. But as in all dramas, the crisis in relations between the inventor and the company has been overcome, and arrangements are now progressing normally.
Channel 6 contacted the the CEO of Defkalion, Mr Ksanthoulis, who makes it clear that Mr. Rossi has every right to cooperate with the US company since their agreement does not prohibit it. However, what is important is that any problems are overcome and the investment proceeds as originally planned.
In closing Mr. Xanthoulis attributed all this disruption to the pressures on both Defkalion and on Mr Rossi, who according to Mr. Xanthoulis, was more vulnerable to such pressure."
D'altro canto, Rossi ha scritto poco fa su JONP:
Andrea Rossi
August 12th, 2011 at 3:05 AM
Dear H. Visscher:
Again, and for the last time:
IT IS TOTALLY FALSE THAT WE AND DEFKALION ARE TOGETHER AGAIN.
THE PRESS RELEASE THAT HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY EFA SRL HAS ALREADY EXPLAINED THE SITUATION.
WE WILL NOT RETURN ON THIS ISSUE.
E sulla questione del possesso o meno dei kernel, Defkalion così risponde a PESN:
Questions:
Did Andrea Rossi ever provide your company the "industrial secret", which would include the information about how to produce an operating "kernel" or reactor core?
Can you confirm that your company has assembled, built, and tested the "kernels" (even if they are the exact same design as Andrea Rossi's), that produce the heat for your final Hyperion systems?
The response that Defkalion's representative, Symeon Tsalikoglou gave is:
Regarding the questions [above], we would prefer to say no comment. We do not need to enter into online conversations / verifications. Although we understand and value the efforts of the community at large to learn more, please respect the fact that we are working hard for this business to move forward and cannot commit more time and efforts toward the growing interest for information - at the moment.
Saluti
Gibed
THe Cat Huggers!
RispondiElimina#
RispondiEliminaAndrea Rossi
August 12th, 2011 at 3:05 AM
Dear H. Visscher:
Again, and for the last time:
IT IS TOTALLY FALSE THAT WE AND DEFKALION ARE TOGETHER AGAIN.
THE PRESS RELEASE THAT HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY EFA SRL ON AUGUST 6TH 2011 HAS ALREADY EXPLAINED THE SITUATION.
WE WILL NOT RETURN ON THIS ISSUE.
C'è da domandarsi ... ma quanti Rossi e Stremmenos ci sono? ... problemi dissociativi? ... toxoplasmosi? .. emisferi cerebrali sconnessi?
>Probably you tried in one of the many moments during which our Journal is under attack from somewhere. Just try again after some hour, when it happens…our very good informatic fights close to every day for this issue.
RispondiEliminaE magari gli attacchi sono lo sforamento della banda mensile concessa? ROTFL!
Sempre piu ridocoli.
E quello che fa pensare è che c'è ancora gente chi gli va dietro!